Subscriber AreaDiscussionCommunity ContributorsStoreASTUSTPMPAIndustry Resources


  PMPA Statute | Table of Contents | Index | Slip Opinions | Search
   
 
I. PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW - § 2806(a)
  • California Service Station & Automotive Repair Ass'n v. Union Oil Company of California, 232 Cal. App. 3d 44, 283 Cal. Rptr. 279 (Cal. Ct. App. 7-10-91)

    Declaratory and injunctive relief to franchisee. State court found that state law pertaining to assignment of franchises was not preempted by the PMPA unless the assignment is used to circumvent a termination or nonrenewal permitted by the PMPA. Franchisor had a policy of refusing to transfer a three-year franchise to a franchisee who had never been a UNOCAL dealer while allowing its franchisees to assign three-year franchises to dealers who had been UNOCAL dealers in the past. Franchisor's requirement that all new franchisees take a one-year trial franchise was found to violate § 21148(a)(3) of the California Bus. & Pro. Code.


Copyright © 2000 - 2007 Petroleum Marketing Law Internet Site. All Rights Reserved. Legal notice.