Subscriber AreaDiscussionCommunity ContributorsStoreASTUSTPMPAIndustry Resources


  PMPA Statute | Table of Contents | Index | Slip Opinions | Search
   
 
F. ENFORCEMENT  :  3. § 2805(b)(2) Preliminary injunction
  • Kane v. Mobil Oil Corp., No 87-4513(SSB)(D.N.J. 12-10-87) Slip Opinion; CCH BFG 9186 (D.N.J. 3-28-88)

    Franchisee granted preliminary injunction upon reconsideration. Held that franchisee has the burden of proof of a threat of wrongful termination when seeking injunctive relief. Reasonableness and materiality of a provision are not to be determined by an objective standard; 24-hour operation requirement is reasonable and of material significance. Hardship to franchisee is not relevant to court's analysis. Franchisee complained about difficulty in complying with the hours-of-operation provision. Franchisor was denied summary judgment because there was a disputed issue of material fact whether failure to operate 24 hours a day was "beyond reasonable control."


Copyright © 2000 - 2007 Petroleum Marketing Law Internet Site. All Rights Reserved. Legal notice.