Subscriber AreaDiscussionCommunity ContributorsStoreASTUSTPMPAIndustry Resources


  PMPA Statute | Table of Contents | Index | Slip Opinions | Search
   
 
  • American Pride Petroleum, Inc. v. Marathon Petroleum Company, LLC, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58971 (E.D. Ky. 8-10-07)

    Dealer admitted to misbranding and also had four EFTs that were dishonored based upon insufficient funds, both of which were proper grounds for termination. (The misbranding was a ground for immediate termination of the franchise relationship.) Dealer’s application for a temporary restraining order was, therefore, denied.


Copyright © 2000 - 2007 Petroleum Marketing Law Internet Site. All Rights Reserved. Legal notice.