Subscriber AreaDiscussionCommunity ContributorsStoreASTUSTPMPAIndustry Resources


  PMPA Statute | Table of Contents | Index | Slip Opinions | Search
   
 
  • Aurigemma v. Arco Petroleum Products Company, 698 F. Supp. 1035 (D. Conn. 10-26-88); 734 F. Supp. 1025 (D. Conn. 4-16-90)

    State statute pertaining to compensation for good will upon franchise termination is not preempted by the PMPA. Also, the PMPA does not preempt Connecticut franchise law with respect to termination of a mini-mart agreement on the basis of a petroleum market withdrawal.


Copyright © 2000 - 2007 Petroleum Marketing Law Internet Site. All Rights Reserved. Legal notice.